While reading Arthur Miller's play “Death of a
Salesman”, what caught my attention was the difference of the vision between the pursuit of the American Dream according to an author from the Beat
Generation (Arthur Miller) and an author from the Lost Generation, such as
Scott Fitzgerald in The Great Gatsby.
To make comparisons, in Death of a Salesman, the main
problem is to not starve, to have a job, to have a family, and to live a quiet
life. And this is the pursuit of the American Dream according to Arthur Miller’s
vision in this play, it seems to be so simple but while reading the book I
understood the struggles of the Loman family to make it day by day, with the
head of the family having hallucinations, and with two grown sons that didn’t
know what to do with their lives, apparently being at ease living still with
their parents and thinking that magically life will be easy and better in the
future.
But on the other hand, in The Great Gatsby, the
pursuit of the American Dream is having more than you need thinking that when
you have all the material stuff, a big house, and a lot of money; you will get
what you really want (In this case: Daisy. The woman that Gatsby has loved
since always) and that you will be happy.
But what I think these two stories have in common is
the ambition (even when there are different pursuits) of the main characters
and the little moral they have when it is about to obtain what they want. And
it made me think that maybe sometimes we wish something so much, and we spent
all our forces to obtain it, but when we have it, it does not seem to be
interesting or it is not useful anymore.
Willy killed himself thinking that his son will have a
great future, but he was not going to be part of it; and Gatsby died thinking
that Daisy was not the same girl he was in love with when he was young and
poor.
Hi, Silvana! I haven't read "The Great Gatsby" but I did read "Death of a Salesman" and I agree with you when you say that Willy has little moral in order to achieve what he wants. I believe that by having his family all together he thinks that every thinq will be alright. And this could happen to us if we don't have clear what is more important for us, and what success means from our point of view. I am not saying that we need to trow away having a family (whatever family means to you) because you want to work, or the other way round. I just think that we can be balanced, even though one of this 'variables' will consume the most of our time. This is why we need to be careful with the decisions we make, if we decide to go for the whole pack, it is necessary that we reflect on the consequences, and whether we will be able to handle both (family and work), or not.
ResponderEliminar